Archive for May 10th, 2011

Fuel tank strap defect in 1997-2001 Ford F150 pickups investigated

Up to 2,700,000 Ford F150 pickup trucks could be affected by a fuel tank problem currently under investigation by safety regulators. The NHTSA said that steel straps used to hold the fuel tank in place can rust and deteriorate over time allowing the fuel tank to drop to the ground, potentially causing a fuel spill and fire. Ford F150 trucks for the 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001 model years are being looked into: NHTSA investigations routinely lead to manufacturer recalls, including a recent recall of F150 pickup trucks for an airbag defect.

Last year the NHTSA received 32 complaints about the fuel tank problem but no injuries have been reported as yet. NHTSA and Ford have received a total of 243 reports of the fuel tanks falling: 2 of those incidents lead to fires: one fire destroyed the pickup truck and the other fire burned out by itself. According to the NHTSA, fuel leaked in 95 of the fuel tank drop incidents. Nine people reported sparks on the roadway when the tank dropped, which would increase the chances of a fire.

For more than 30 years Ford’s F150 has been the best selling vehicle in the United States. Owners with questions about how their vehicle may be affected should contact their nearest Ford dealership. Fortunately there are no known reports of injury, however this defect poses a serious risk of harm: a fuel tank could drop on a F150 parked in a garage only to start a fire that could spread to the rest of the home.

If you have been seriously injured in an accident resulting from a fuel tank dropping in a 1997-2001 Ford F150 pickup truck, call the experienced personal injury attorneys at Smith & Hassler for a free consultation regarding your potential products liability case.

This picture shows a replacement fuel tank strap installed in a 2001 Ford F150 with a badly rusted fuel tank

Driver of U-Haul falls asleep on Eastex Freeway and crashes into police car

Click2Houston.com is reporting an asleep-at-the-wheel accident on the Eastex Freeway that injured several drivers. The driver of a U-Haul truck fell asleep at the wheel and caused a chain reaction collision that included a Houston Police Department patrol car. The accident was in the southbound lanes of the Eastex Freeway near Rankin Road at around 11:35am today, Monday May 9, 2011. An HPD officer had pulled over the driver of a silver Jaguar car and was writing a ticket when the U-Haul struck the back of the officer’s patrol car, pushing it into the back of the Jaguar. The police officer was put on a stretcher and taken to hospital, however early indications are that, thankfully, the officer’s injuries are not critical. The driver of the Jaguar was taken to hospital and two passengers inside the U-Haul were also injured. The U-Haul driver told police that he and his passengers had been up all night and were driving from Tyler, Texas when the driver fell asleep at the wheel and caused the collision.

U-Haul driver falls asleep rear-ending a HPD patrol car and pushing it into a silver Jaguar

Texas house passes more tort reform with HB274 but “loser pays” may mean winner pays.

Today HB 274 was passed by a 96 to 49 vote in the Texas house of representatives. The bill, which has come to be known as “loser pays,” was a top priority of Texas’ governor Rick Perry and the influential lobbying group Texans for Lawsuit Reform. The issue of tort reform is such a priority for Governor Perry in fact that he declared it a legislative emergency last week, bumping HB 274 to the top of the list and allowing legislators to pass it more quickly. It is interesting that Gov. Perry considered tort reform an emergency matter at a time when Texans are facing a state budget crisis, profoundly affecting (among other things) schools’ budgets for hiring new teachers. Over the weekend the speaker of the house temporarily suspended the house rules, allowing the Republican supermajority to pass HB274 without any debate or amendment (though some debate and a number of amendments took place today before the bill was passed).

The next step for HB274 is on to the state senate. Texas has 31 senate seats, of which 19 are currently held by Republicans and 12 by Democrats. The bill makes it harder for Texans to bring civil lawsuits, and the “loser pays” provision may put a Plaintiff in a lawsuit on the hook for the Defendant’s legal costs, including attorneys’ fees…even if the Plaintiff wins the lawsuit at trial. Supporters of HB274 claim the law will cut down on frivolous lawsuits, opponents say legitimate lawsuits will be discouraged because people with a legal claim will be afraid to file suit in case they lose and are liable for the other side’s attorneys’ fees.

Under HB274, if a Plaintiff takes their lawsuit to trial and the jury awards the Plaintiff less than 80% of the amount of the Defendant’s settlement offer, the Defendant could collect from the Plaintiff their litigation costs, including attorneys’ fees, even if the amount of those attorneys’ fees are greater than the amount awarded by the jury.

Here’s an example: Paul Plaintiff is rear-ended at a stop light by Dan Defendant, a driver who had been drinking.  Paul Plaintiff has $5,000 in past medical bills and Paul’s doctor tells Paul he needs a $20,000 knee surgery to treat his injuries from the accident. Paul files a lawsuit seeking $25,000: his past medical bills and the cost of the knee surgery Paul needs. Dan Defendant’s insurance company offers Paul $15,000 hoping he will take it and give up and go away.  Paul can’t accept $15,000 because that’s not enough to pay for his knee surgery.  The case goes to trial and the jury awards Paul $11,000 because the defense attorney does a good job convincing the jury Paul’s knee problem might be from a 12-year old soccer injury. The defense attorney hired an orthopedic surgeon who routinely testifies on behalf on insurance companies to come to trial and testify and pays the hired expert $10,000 for his time. Dan Defendant’s attorney, the attorney’s junior associate and their paralegal have billed $15,000 taking the case through trial.  Because the amount the jury awarded Paul Plaintiff ($11,000) is less than 80% of the insurance company’s offer ($15,000), Paul Plaintiff now has to pay Dan Defendant’s $25,000 in legal expenses.  Paul Plaintiff gets an $11,000 credit for the amount the jury awarded, but Paul still owes Dan $14,000…for being rear-ended at a stop light by a drunk driver.

Does that mean Paul Plaintiff’s lawsuit against Dan Defendant was frivolous…or brought in bad faith? Of course not. But in terms of Paul’s liability for Dan’s litigation expenses, the justness of his claim doesn’t matter. And that’s HB274 in action folks.

If you don’t like HB274 and you don’t think it should be the law in Texas, contact your state senator while you can. Here is a link to a web site that allows you to enter your address: it will tell you who your state senator is and will allow you to send them a letter via email.